If by "new kernel" you mean 2.2.0, then no, it does not.
Seriously, the 127MB swap partition limitation disapeared about 2 years
ago.
--- Auyeung at Technet Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to interrupt,
>
> Does the newer kernels still have the 127M limit on swap partition
> size?
>
> Regards
> Auyeung
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I just noticed that on SuSE, swap is mounted w/ a priority of 42. I
> know that
> > if you don't specify a priority it gets a priority of '-1'.
> > I understand what the swap priority is for (man 2 swapon), but why
> set it to
> > 42? Is that better than -1? Or is it just a Douglas Adams reference?
=====
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com
.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
