On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500 > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel sounc > was > posted > > for public consumption... > > > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this much > fun in my > > OS/2 days! > > > > 2.5.0 came out with 2.4.15. They both have the same shutdown > filesystem > corruption error. Fix was 2.4.16 and a patch to 2.5.0. Only > difference is in > the Makefile at the top where one says 2.4.15 and the other 2.5.0. > > You sure are slow. > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is this usual with kernel patches. I don't have a clue what to do about these. Did I make the right choices? Is this totally normal with kernel patches? I'm afraid to use the resulting kernel source until I know more. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
