Previously, Joel Hammer chose to write: > Like the author, I too find that staroffice works, despite being > ugly. Since I have upgraded to a faster work station, it doesn't seem > so slow. I was suprised that he sounded as if all the various workers > were running software installed locally, not on a server with X terminals > for clients. That is the place you make your money, I think. However, > unlike him, I have found staroffice to be a fine platform to load *ppt > documents, and, if you want, it is OK for email and web browsing. It seems > especially nice for reading attachements, compared to other alternatives. > I am a bit suprised they just didn't use StarOffice all the way, ie. for > email and web browsing, too. >
FYI, StarOffice 6 will not have e-mail or web browsing capabilities. The entire desktop thingy that SO 5.2 had is gone, too. Tim -- Caldera eWorkstation 3.1, kernel 2.4.9, KDE 2.2.1, Xfree86 4.1.0 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
