On Monday 28 January 2002 10:14 am, Mike Andrew wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:59, Dallam Wych wrote: > > In what context are you saying that winmodems cannot respond to AT > > commands? Certainly they must respond to AT commands if they > > communicate through wvdial as there are several commands involved in > > the process. > > Ooops. When I'm wrong, I like to be *completely wrong* <slap>
Gee, I almost called you on this but then gave you the benefit of the doubt. I assumed you were saying that the 'modem itself' cannot respond to AT commands. However the driver for the modem could respond. (that's what you really meant, wasn't it?? ;-) -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 01/28/02 10:30 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads." _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
