On Sun 10 Jan 2016 13:53:43 NZDT +1300, criggie wrote:

> This GMX claim is "secure-washing" at best.

GMX is a LOT further than any NZ ISP will be for some time.

The large European (or at least the German) ISPs agreed a while ago to
raise minimum standards:

 * Email amongst each other is only transported on encrypted channels.
 * Plain text logins (IMAP, POP, SMTP, anything) will be shut down after
 a certain date (which has long passed).
 * (I believe) The really useless ciphers won't be used any more.

I'm not too worried about email sitting unencrypted on a continental-
European server, especially a German one. They operate under privacy
legislation Kiwis can only dream of. For anything better I use gpg.

ISPs in this neck of the woods seem to argue "it's always insecure, so
why do anything". I know one who can't even install certificates
properly, customers insisting on ecrypted logins seem to be a rare
species - i.e. encryption is optional and not even encouraged. Pathetic.

Technically calling GMX "secure" is incorrect, but "much more secure" is
definitely true.

Btw I noticed that Posteo has put up an English user interface. They are
about as good as it gets.   http://posteo.nz

Volker

-- 
Volker Kuhlmann
http://volker.top.geek.nz/      Please do not CC list postings to me.
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to