On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Markus Kuhn wrote: > problems, once we have agreed on how to handle Plan1 fonts in X11). Are there any proposals around about how to do that? In the long term, yes, we want to use >21-bit characters in X, but until then we need to come up with an EvilHack (tm). I'd suggest -iso10646-p1, -iso10646-p2, ... -iso10646-pf, -iso10646-p10 How does that sound? Plane 1 is quite important to me at least, as Elvish characters will be encoded there. -- Robert - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Ping Yeh
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Florian Weimer
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Florian Weimer
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Robert Brady
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation in gcc... Nuesser, Wilhelm
- Re: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Ulrich Drepper
- RE: Proposal for 2 Byte Unicode implementation i... Bruno Haible
