On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 03:36:53PM -0500, Sandra O'donnell USG wrote:
>
> That aside, I do not see how the sentence you refer to in N706R2
> (quoted here) answers my question about you implying you alone
> can decide what to take in to PDTR 14652. Of course, Kent and you
> have clarified that whatever happens, this won't be an ISO standard
> as you originally claimed.
I cannot just put anything I like into an ISO document, I do agree
with you on that. But I am allowed to put text into the document if
it is agreed by WG20. WG20 does not have to agree with every
word I write in the first place, the procedure is that we agree
on the functionality and then I write up something to cover that,
and the editing group can then discuss this.
I said it would be an ISO specification, not an ISO standard.
I am painfully aware of that. But an ISO TR is still an ISO specification.
Kind regards
Keld
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
