Sorry for this question which is slightly off topic:
Are the UTF-8 definitions in ISO/IEC 10646-1:200 and RFC 2279
identical or equivalent? Can any harm result if a nomative document
refers to both definitions (this is a bad idea if the definitions are
slightly different).
And BTW: Does ISO 10646 define character properties (such as lowercase
letter, uppercase letter, titlecase letter, other letter, decimal
digit, other digit and so on)?
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
