mån 2001-11-26 klockan 15.17 skrev Richard, Francois M:
> 
> 
> Reading http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/locale/, my
> understanding is that "Universal Locales for Linux" added a lot of utf-8
> based Locales to the standard set of Linux Locales. Theses Locales also
> extend the POSIX Locale model by adding LC_NAME, LC_ADDRESS, LC_PAPER,
> LC_MEASUREMENT and LC_TELEPHONE.

I had a quick look on the only locale I know, sv_SE, from that package.
It is way wrong. The sv_SE locale in glibc is much better, (but not
perfect).

Regards,

        Martin

-- 
[ http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d95mback/ ] [ PGP: 0x453504F1 ] [ UIN:
4439498 ]
    Opinions expressed above are mine, and not those of my future
employees.
SIGBORE: Signature boring error, core dumped

--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to