mån 2001-11-26 klockan 15.17 skrev Richard, Francois M: > > > Reading http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/locale/, my > understanding is that "Universal Locales for Linux" added a lot of utf-8 > based Locales to the standard set of Linux Locales. Theses Locales also > extend the POSIX Locale model by adding LC_NAME, LC_ADDRESS, LC_PAPER, > LC_MEASUREMENT and LC_TELEPHONE.
I had a quick look on the only locale I know, sv_SE, from that package. It is way wrong. The sv_SE locale in glibc is much better, (but not perfect). Regards, Martin -- [ http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d95mback/ ] [ PGP: 0x453504F1 ] [ UIN: 4439498 ] Opinions expressed above are mine, and not those of my future employees. SIGBORE: Signature boring error, core dumped -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/