Dnia 24-04-2007, wto o godzinie 16:43 -0400, SrinTuar
napisał(a):

> Basically, its a proposal to cap at 10FFFF.
> 
> I see no reason to cap utf-8 and utf-32 just to deal with the
> limitations of utf-16.

Too late, it has already been decided.

And it’s harmless. There aren’t going to be any characters above
U+10FFFF ever allocated by ISO-10646 or Unicode. So it’s better
to conform to the standards, to improve consistency and reliability.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/


--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to