Hi Moritz, On Monday 22 September 2008, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 03:03:13 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > I had a sneaky suspicion my camera was stuck in top quality. Laurent > > > Pinchart's comments from March 25th confirmed and were a nice > > > blueprint for this patch. > > > > First of all, thanks for the patch. > > [...] > > > Great :-) I'll have a look at the code after this weekend, and commit the > > changes to SVN. > > > > Thanks a lot for your patch. > > Has this patch[*] been obsoleted, or forgotten, or perhaps even rejected?
Mostly forgotten actually. I'm working on reviving it, but I first have to implement proper workarounds for webcams that don't implement the GET_MIN/GET_MAX requests on the video probe control properly (and there are many of them). I'll soon post a patch for review/testing on the list, and I'll then work on the JPEG quality patch. > The recent release of motion mentions this in its CHANGELOG (though I > think the patch is unrelated to the named issue): > http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/UvcvideoMjpegPatch That's related. Thanks for the information. I'll contact the authors of motion after committing JPEG quality support to update their wiki. Best regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
