Hello,
The way I thought that the UVC driver worked was that it provides a
facade over the hardware drivers, kinda like a system API which
manufacturers (or OS developers) can design their drivers towards. Is this
not the case? I also tried digging around on the PWC lists but they are
pretty dead. I assume from your question that pwc and uvc are not working
in tandem but you can use one or the other. I guess my task is to test the
camera with uvc and pwc to see if I can get a higher resolution - is there a
way to force the camera to boot up in either system?
Cheers,
Neil
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Neil Benn wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I working on connecting a philips usb webcam to an OpenMoko
> > FreeRunner with Debian. I have the camera working using the uvc dreiver
> > but I'm getting a rather poor resolution at 160*120. The device only
> runs
> > in host mode as USB1.1 - even though, I would have thought that 160 * 120
> > is pretty poor even for a 1.1 connection (or am I wrong). However I've
> > been looking around for a new version of the pwc driver as it seems that
> > the drier I have is the old pwc/pwcx driver. I downloaded the latest
> > verswion of the driver from Luc Saillaard but that does not compile. I
> > suspect that it is due to my old 2.6.24 kernel?
>
> What makes you think the pwc driver is in any way related to the uvcvideo
> driver ? :-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
