On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:

> The first patch was rejected back then because H.264 support in the V4L2 API
> had to be implemented differently. Recent discussions about H.264 and V4L2
> resulted in a different position, so I can now apply the patch. I've asked
> Stephan for his Signed-off-by line and I will push it to v3.2.
>

Glad to here it.

Of course it is good when you can make one interface for different
entities, but it is really hard to unify DVB-S capture and UVC.
One is MPEG-TS, other is raw stream.
_______________________________________________
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
Linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel

Reply via email to