> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li Yang-Leo-R58472
> Sent: 2015年9月23日 1:23
> To: Hou Zhiqiang-B48286; Mark Rutland; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Xie Shaohui-B21989;
> [email protected]; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; [email protected]; wsa@the-
> dreams.de; [email protected]; [email protected]; Song Wenbin-B53747; Wood
> Scott-B07421; Hu Mingkai-B21284
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/6] arm64/ls1043a: add DTS for Freescale LS1043A SoC
>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > +/memreserve/ 0x80000000 0x00010000;
> > >
> > > Why is this necessary?
> >
> > This memory region is pre-reserved for the spin-table/psci, although
> > didn't add Enable method of secondary cores.
>
> Can this be reserved by bootloader?
Yes, the memory for psci was reserved by u-boot code. But due to spin-table
need the release address, is it better adding the /memreserve/ in dts file?
Or add it by bootloader and fix the release address accordingly?
>
> >
> > > If this is necessary, please add a comment stating what this is for.
> > >
> > > > + cpu@3 {
> > > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> > > > + reg = <0x0 0x3>;
> > > > + clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > Missing enable-method properties on all the secondary CPUs.
> > >
> >
> > There are two methods (spin-table and psci) to bring up secondary
> > cores, which one do you think is better?
>
> Do we have the PSCI support ready in both UEFI and u-boot? If not, we
> should use spin-table for now.
>
our internal u-boot supports PSCI but opensource doesn't support it for ARMv8.
Thanks,
Zhiqiang
N�Р骒r��y����b�X�肚�v�^�)藓{.n�+�伐�{绷�\�� �{ay� �����,j��f＂�h���z� �wア�
⒎�j:+v���w�j�m������赙zZ+�����茛j"��!�i
