On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:55:03PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
> From: Carlo Caione <[email protected]>
> 
> With this patch we refactor the driver code to enable watchdog support
> for all platforms based on Amlogic meson SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/meson_wdt.c | 55 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/meson_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/meson_wdt.c
> index 1f4155e..89944ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/meson_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/meson_wdt.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/reboot.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -27,34 +28,45 @@
>  #define DRV_NAME             "meson_wdt"
>  
>  #define MESON_WDT_TC         0x00
> -#define MESON_WDT_TC_EN              BIT(22)
> -#define MESON_WDT_TC_TM_MASK 0x3fffff
>  #define MESON_WDT_DC_RESET   (3 << 24)
>  
>  #define MESON_WDT_RESET              0x04
>  
> -#define MESON_WDT_TIMEOUT    30
> +#define MESON_WDT_TIMEOUT    5
>  #define MESON_WDT_MIN_TIMEOUT        1
> -#define MESON_WDT_MAX_TIMEOUT        (MESON_WDT_TC_TM_MASK / 100000)
>  
> -#define MESON_SEC_TO_TC(s)   ((s) * 100000)
> +#define MESON_SEC_TO_TC(s, c)        ((s) * (c))
>  
>  static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
>  static unsigned int timeout = MESON_WDT_TIMEOUT;
>  
> +struct meson_wdt_data {
> +     unsigned int shift_enable;
> +     unsigned int terminal_count_mask;
> +     unsigned int count_unit;
> +};
> +
> +static struct meson_wdt_data meson6_wdt_data = {
> +     .shift_enable           = 22,

I have to admit that I completely fail to understand why it would be
better to move the bit calculation from a constant to runtime.

Can you explain ?

I am also not really a friend of removing definitions, even if they are
only used once. But I understand that this is a matter of opinion.

> +     .terminal_count_mask    = 0x3fffff,
> +     .count_unit             = 100000, /* 10 us */
> +};
> +
>  struct meson_wdt_dev {
>       struct watchdog_device wdt_dev;
>       void __iomem *wdt_base;
>       struct notifier_block restart_handler;
> +     struct meson_wdt_data *data;
>  };
>  
>  static int meson_restart_handle(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long 
> mode,
>                               void *cmd)
>  {
> -     u32 tc_reboot = MESON_WDT_DC_RESET | MESON_WDT_TC_EN;
> +     u32 tc_reboot = MESON_WDT_DC_RESET;
>       struct meson_wdt_dev *meson_wdt = container_of(this,
>                                                      struct meson_wdt_dev,
>                                                      restart_handler);
> +     tc_reboot |= BIT(meson_wdt->data->shift_enable);
>  

I am quite sure that this results in a checkpatch warning.
Did you run your patch through checkpatch ?

>       while (1) {
>               writel(tc_reboot, meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
> @@ -80,8 +92,8 @@ static void meson_wdt_change_timeout(struct watchdog_device 
> *wdt_dev,
>       u32 reg;
>  
>       reg = readl(meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
> -     reg &= ~MESON_WDT_TC_TM_MASK;
> -     reg |= MESON_SEC_TO_TC(timeout);
> +     reg &= ~(meson_wdt->data->terminal_count_mask);

Unnecessary ( )

> +     reg |= MESON_SEC_TO_TC(timeout, meson_wdt->data->count_unit);
>       writel(reg, meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
>  }
>  
> @@ -102,7 +114,7 @@ static int meson_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
>       u32 reg;
>  
>       reg = readl(meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
> -     reg &= ~MESON_WDT_TC_EN;
> +     reg &= ~BIT(meson_wdt->data->shift_enable);
>       writel(reg, meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -117,7 +129,7 @@ static int meson_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device 
> *wdt_dev)
>       meson_wdt_ping(wdt_dev);
>  
>       reg = readl(meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
> -     reg |= MESON_WDT_TC_EN;
> +     reg |= BIT(meson_wdt->data->shift_enable);
>       writel(reg, meson_wdt->wdt_base + MESON_WDT_TC);
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -138,10 +150,17 @@ static const struct watchdog_ops meson_wdt_ops = {
>       .set_timeout    = meson_wdt_set_timeout,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id meson_wdt_dt_ids[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-wdt", .data = &meson6_wdt_data },
> +     { /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_wdt_dt_ids);
> +
>  static int meson_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       struct resource *res;
>       struct meson_wdt_dev *meson_wdt;
> +     const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>       int err;
>  
>       meson_wdt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*meson_wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -153,11 +172,19 @@ static int meson_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       if (IS_ERR(meson_wdt->wdt_base))
>               return PTR_ERR(meson_wdt->wdt_base);
>  
> +     of_id = of_match_device(meson_wdt_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> +     if (!of_id) {
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to setup WDT data\n");

"set up" or maybe better initialize.

> +             return -ENODEV;
> +     }
> +     meson_wdt->data = (struct meson_wdt_data *) of_id->data;

Is this typecase necessary ?

> +
>       meson_wdt->wdt_dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>       meson_wdt->wdt_dev.info = &meson_wdt_info;
>       meson_wdt->wdt_dev.ops = &meson_wdt_ops;
>       meson_wdt->wdt_dev.timeout = MESON_WDT_TIMEOUT;
> -     meson_wdt->wdt_dev.max_timeout = MESON_WDT_MAX_TIMEOUT;
> +     meson_wdt->wdt_dev.max_timeout =
> +             meson_wdt->data->terminal_count_mask / 
> meson_wdt->data->count_unit;
>       meson_wdt->wdt_dev.min_timeout = MESON_WDT_MIN_TIMEOUT;
>  
>       watchdog_set_drvdata(&meson_wdt->wdt_dev, meson_wdt);
> @@ -204,12 +231,6 @@ static void meson_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       meson_wdt_stop(&meson_wdt->wdt_dev);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct of_device_id meson_wdt_dt_ids[] = {
> -     { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-wdt" },
> -     { /* sentinel */ }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_wdt_dt_ids);
> -
>  static struct platform_driver meson_wdt_driver = {
>       .probe          = meson_wdt_probe,
>       .remove         = meson_wdt_remove,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to