On 09/27/2014 12:37 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27 September 2014 10:33, Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> wrote:
>> I would make GPIO a subdevive of chipcommon. The chipcommon core has an
>> own IRQ which is also used for GPIO.
> 
> Which ChipCommon do yo mean?
> 1) chipcommonA (compatible = "simple-bus")
> 2) chipcommon@0 (child of axi@18000000 AKA brcm,bus-axi)

We should combine this (both are describing the same core) I added
chipcommonA to get some serial without adding bcma support first. When
we have dts support added to bcma, I would like to remove chipcommonA
from dtsi and add a chipcommon as a child of axi.

> 
> It seems that for some reason both of them use IRQ 85, while the IRQ
> for ChipCommon is 117 I believe.

That's the same.

In the dtsi file it says:
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
this will result in the IRQ number 117, when it is GIC_SPI you have to
add 32 to the irq number to get the actual number which will be given to
request_irq().

Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to