On 02/13/2015 01:47 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> > > We currently have a hand-rolled table with 256 entries and are > using the last byte of the MAC address as the hash. This hash > is obviously very fast, but collisions are easily created and > we waste a lot of space in the common case of just connecting > as a client to an AP where we just have a single station. The > other common case of an AP is also suboptimal due to the size > of the hash table and the ease of causing collisions. > > Convert all of this to use rhashtable with jhash, which gives > us the advantage of a far better hash function (with random > perturbation to avoid hash collision attacks) and of course > that the hash table grows and shrinks dynamically with chain > length, improving both cases above.
Oooh, maybe finally time to mix local addr with peer addr to make lots of vifs connected to same AP hash well too? :) Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
