On Monday 16 March 2015 22:01:43 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> [150316 13:59]: > > On Monday 16 March 2015 16:29:39 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > I believe the last pending issues is the support for > > > ATAG_REVISION in device tree mode as posted by Pali. > > > > No. In DT boot there is missing /proc/atags file (readable > > by userspace processes). > > Oh OK thanks for the update. > > > And also broken AES/SHA/MD5 support. Fix for crypto DT stuff > > I already sent. > > But this is not a regression in mainline with legacy boot vs > device tree based booting, right? Sounds like it never worked > in the mainline or am thinking of some other set of patches? > > Regards, > > Tony
In legacy board code are DMA channels defined. In DT files not. So I think this is regression. Omap secure devices are broken in both legacy & DT code, but non secure could work with legacy code. But all devices booted with DT are broken. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
