On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:29:44PM +0530, Chandra Gorentla wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:11:56PM +0530, Chandra S Gorentla wrote:
> > Moved the opening brace of code blocks to the previous lines. This
> > fixes the checkpatch.pl error - "that open brace { should be on the
> > previous line".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandra S Gorentla <csgoren...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 9 +++------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > index c2ef46f..779ec5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> > @@ -1205,8 +1205,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
> >
> >
> >
> > - if (!pairwise)
> > - {
> > + if (!pairwise) {
> > if (params->cipher == WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP)
> > u8gmode = ENCRYPT_ENABLED | WPA | TKIP;
> > else
> > @@ -1304,8 +1303,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_add_key(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
> >
> > {
> > u8mode = 0;
> > - if (!pairwise)
> > - {
> > + if (!pairwise) {
> > if (params->key_len > 16 && params->cipher ==
> > WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_TKIP) {
> > /* swap the tx mic by rx mic */
> > pu8RxMic = params->key + 24;
> > @@ -1531,8 +1529,7 @@ static int WILC_WFI_get_key(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> > struct net_device *netdev, u8 k
> > priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
> >
> >
> > - if (!pairwise)
> > - {
> > + if (!pairwise) {
> > PRINT_D(CFG80211_DBG, "Getting group key idx: %x\n", key_index);
> >
> > key_params.key = priv->wilc_gtk[key_index]->key;
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
>
> Hello Greg,
>
> I sent 3 patches in this series. The subject lines of other 2 are -
>
> [PATCH v3 3/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: remove space after '('
> [PATCH v3 1/3] drivers: staging: wilc1000: use 'void' for no arguments
> functions
>
> These two patches (1/3 and 3/3) were accepted but not the patch (2/3) in this
> mail. Any reason for not accepting? Is any thing wrong with this patch -
> 2/3?
> If so, I can correct and send again.
Rebase your series on the tree and see what happens to your 2/3 patch :)
(hint, someone else sent the same patch before you did, so it is not
needed anymore...)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
