Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> writes:
> On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 15:19 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> writes:
>> > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 15:04 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I have this in the code - that said, I may not be getting a
>> > > pointer
>> > > back ever?
>> > >
>> > > if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_ERP_PREAMBLE) {
>> > > ...
>> > > sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, bss_conf->bssid);
>> > > if (sta) {
>> > > sta_priv = (struct rtl8xxxu_sta_priv
>> > > *)sta
>> > > ->drv_priv;
>> > > if (bss_conf->use_short_preamble)
>> > > sta_priv->short_preamble = true;
>> > > else
>> > > sta_priv->short_preamble =
>> > > false;
>> > >
>> >
>> > Ah, ok. You'd of course get a pointer back here - but it's
>> > pointless.
>> >
>> > You might as well store the value in some private vif data, or
>> > perhaps
>> > just use vif->bss_conf.use_short_preamble in the place that you're
>> > now
>> > using sta_priv->short_preamble - the point was that a per-station
>> > setting of short-preamble doesn't make sense, it needs to be per
>> > -vif.
>>
>> I see - what is the correct way to get to the vif from with the .tx()
>> function then?
>
> You have a pointer right there in the skb's cb (info) [though it might
> be NULL in some rare cases]
Think I got it right now - this allowed me to get rid of the sta_priv
stuff as well.
Thanks a lot for the help!
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
