> Using > WARN_ON(!a ^ !b) > which is logically the same as what I wrote above > for clarity is simply a bit more coverage and maybe > even a bit run-time faster. > > Didn't think about that. Love your bit fiddling trick! After an approval/rejection of my patch I can submit another one with your suggestion unless you want to do it yourself...
/Ola -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
