On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:17:15AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> writes: > > > Hi David, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on wireless-drivers-next/master] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.5-rc5 next-20160224] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > > help improving the system] > > > > url: > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Emmanuel-Grumbach/mac80211_hwsim-Set-global-RRM-capability/20160225-172733 > > base: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git > > master > > config: sparc64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > > reproduce: > > wget > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross > > -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make.cross ARCH=sparc64 > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c: In function > > 'mac80211_hwsim_new_radio': > >>> drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c:2462:35: error: > >>> 'NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_RRM' undeclared (first use in this function) > > wiphy_ext_feature_set(hw->wiphy, NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_RRM); > > ^ > > drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c:2462:35: note: each undeclared > > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > I think this build failure is because mac80211_hwsim is an exception to > other wireless drivers and is applied via mac80211-next. Should we add > an entry for mac80211_hwsim to MAINTAINERS with the correct git tree? I > think kbuild test robot follows MAINTAINERS file nowdays (or at least I > understood that's the plan).
That's right. The robot parses MAINTAINERS when judging which tree to apply LKML patches to. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
