From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>

In rsi_send_data_pkt(), it's a little more logical to assign 'status' in
the actual error handling code as opposed to at the top of the functon.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
[Deleted controversial bits, rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby <julian.cal...@gmail.com>

---

I'm not fussed if this one goes in or not as the central concept of the
patch can be argued both ways.

Markus had originally added changes to move the setting of adapter down to
just before it was used, however people rightly objected to it, so it's
been removed from this re-send and the commit message re-written to
reflect this.

Thanks,

Julian Calaby
---
 drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c
index 4322df1..a0b31c0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ int rsi_send_data_pkt(struct rsi_common *common, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
        struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
        struct skb_info *tx_params;
        struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss;
-       int status = -EINVAL;
+       int status;
        u8 ieee80211_size = MIN_802_11_HDR_LEN;
        u8 extnd_size;
        __le16 *frame_desc;
@@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ int rsi_send_data_pkt(struct rsi_common *common, struct 
sk_buff *skb)
        bss = &info->control.vif->bss_conf;
        tx_params = (struct skb_info *)info->driver_data;
 
-       if (!bss->assoc)
+       if (!bss->assoc) {
+               status = -EINVAL;
                goto err;
+       }
 
        tmp_hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)&skb->data[0];
        seq_num = (le16_to_cpu(tmp_hdr->seq_ctrl) >> 4);
-- 
2.7.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to