On 05/10/2016 12:12 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
Hi Ben,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:12:10PM -0700, gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>

Not sure this can happen, but seems like a reasonable sanity
check.

[shafi] possibly if the peer is removed and the bit is not cleared in the driver
? when the new peer occupies the slot

A firmware bug could cause this, but I never saw this WARN hit.  Still seems 
like
a good sanity check to me, though...it would be quite hard to debug this sort 
of bug
if it actually did happen.

Thanks,
Ben



Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
---
  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
index a779a4e..2edef8a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ void ath10k_peer_map_event(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
        ath10k_warn(ar, /*ATH10K_DBG_HTT,*/ "htt peer map vdev %d peer %pM id 
%d\n",
                   ev->vdev_id, ev->addr, ev->peer_id);

+       WARN_ON(ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] && (ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] != 
peer));
        ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] = peer;
        set_bit(ev->peer_id, peer->peer_ids);
  exit:
--
2.4.3

regards,
shafi



_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to