The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT
binding document say that the "interrupts" property in the child node is
optional. So the property being missed shouldn't be treated as an error.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
index 1c17e624547a..8b3292eaecb2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev, struct
sdio_mmc_card *card)
if (cfg && card->plt_of_node) {
cfg->irq_wifi = irq_of_parse_and_map(card->plt_of_node, 0);
if (!cfg->irq_wifi) {
- dev_err(dev,
+ dev_dbg(dev,
"fail to parse irq_wifi from device tree\n");
} else {
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, cfg->irq_wifi,
--
2.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
