On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 18:30 +0300, Maxim Altshul wrote:
> Mesh HWMP module will be able to rely on the HW
> RC algorithm if it exists, for path metric calculations.
>
> This allows the metric calculation mechanism to calculate
> a correct metric, based on PER and last TX rate both via
> HW RC algorithm if it exists or via parameters collected
> by the SW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Altshul <maxim.alts...@ti.com>
> ---
> Changed the function to return u32, I agree that this
> is much clearer.
> As for the rate, two things:
> 1. I had to divide the returned value by 100, since
> drv_get_expected_throughput returns values in units of Kbps.
> On the contrary, the function cfg80211_calculate_bitrate
> returns in units of 100Kbps, so a correction is needed.
> 2. Why return the value into rate?
> As I understand, rate here is actually bitrate,
> and so, we have two possible outcomes:
> - A SW/HW RC algo does exist, and an estimated throughput is
> returned. err is set to 0 (as it is already included in the RC algo)
> and the airtime is calculated using the estimated throughput.
> - A SW/HW RC algo does not exist, and thus the regular calculation
> takes place, in which an estimated throughput is calculated
> using the bitrate and the err parameter.
> From this calculation the airtime is calculated.
>
> net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
> index c6be0b4..ad67f46 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
> @@ -322,19 +322,28 @@ static u32 airtime_link_metric_get(struct
> ieee80211_local *local,
> int device_constant = 1 << ARITH_SHIFT;
> int test_frame_len = TEST_FRAME_LEN << ARITH_SHIFT;
> int s_unit = 1 << ARITH_SHIFT;
> - int rate, err;
> + int rate = 0, err = 0;
The rate init is wrong - you overwrite it immediately.
The err init is questionable - I think it might be better to write
if (rate) {
err = 0;
} else {
...
}
below?
> u32 tx_time, estimated_retx;
> u64 result;
>
> - if (sta->mesh->fail_avg >= 100)
> - return MAX_METRIC;
> + /* Try to get rate based on HW/SW RC algorithm.
> + * Rate is returned in units of Kbps, correct this
> + * to comply with airtime calculation units
> + */
> + rate = sta_get_expected_throughput(sta) / 100;
> +
> + /* if we did not get a rate */
> + if (!rate) {
Maybe you want DIV_ROUND_UP to account for getting a very lot estimated
rate (< 100Kbps) returned, which isn't "no rate"?
Ohterwise looks fine.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
