> > They have three possible values ... :) > > Ah, no, not the handlers themselves. Meant the invoke_tx_handlers() > function (or all three of them after my patch; hence the plural). To > avoid the "0 means true" confusion you alluded to :) >
Ah. Actually, even I got confused and thought the return value *was* the same as the handler. I think it doesn't matter to be tricky, gcc is probably going to (have to) generate exactly the same code like when you explicitly put an if statement in there, it seems? johannes
