> Yeah so apparently the overhead involved in 256-QAM 5/6 (MCS 9) > results in lower effective bitrate than just using MCS 8 (unless > you're using 3 spatial streams).
Ah. I took a - very brief - look at why this one is invalid and couldn't figure it out. > Sounds like a rate control or reporting bug then. > Please drop this. > Ok, thanks. johannes
