> There is a field, no_80211_encap, added to ieee80211_tx_info:control
> to mark if the 802.11 encapsulation is offloaded to driver.
> There is also a new callback for tx completion status indication
> to handle data frames using 802.11 encap offload.

I'm not sure I see the need for this? Maybe I'll find out in this patch
:)

> +                     /* XXX: This frame is not encaptulated with
> 802.11
> +                      * header. Should this be added to
> %IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_*
> +                      * flags?.
> +                      */
> +                     bool no_80211_encap;
> +                     /* 3 bytes free */
>               } control;

probably - just to preserve more space.

> + * @IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_OFFL: Offload configuration
> + *   implementing 802.11 encap/decap for data frames changed.
>   */
>  enum ieee80211_conf_changed {
>       IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_SMPS              = BIT(1),
> @@ -1279,6 +1286,7 @@ enum ieee80211_conf_changed {
>       IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL           = BIT(6),
>       IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_RETRY_LIMITS      = BIT(7),
>       IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE              = BIT(8),
> +     IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_OFFL    = BIT(9),
>  };

Given the requirements (PN check, etc.) I'm not sure how this can
change dynamically?

> + * @encap_decap_80211_offloaded: Whether 802.11 header encap/decap
> offload
> + *   is enabled
>   */
>  struct ieee80211_conf {
>       u32 flags;
> @@ -1346,6 +1357,7 @@ struct ieee80211_conf {
>       struct cfg80211_chan_def chandef;
>       bool radar_enabled;
>       enum ieee80211_smps_mode smps_mode;
> +     bool encap_decap_80211_offloaded;

Please don't add anything here that's interface specific.

> --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static int ieee80211_change_iface(struct wiphy
> *wiphy,
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     ieee80211_if_check_80211_hdr_offl(sdata,
> +                                       params ? params->use_4addr 
> : false,
> +                                       true);
> +
>       return 0;
>  }

Wouldn't it be better to simply prohibit changing this while the
interface is up, and re-init it later when it goes up?

> +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,8 @@ struct ieee80211_local {
>       /* TDLS channel switch */
>       struct work_struct tdls_chsw_work;
>       struct sk_buff_head skb_queue_tdls_chsw;
> +
> +     bool data_80211_hdr_offloaded;

Again, don't put interface specific things into device structures.

> +int ieee80211_lookup_ra_sta(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> +                         struct sk_buff *skb,
> +                         struct sta_info **sta_out);

Return the sta_info pointer, and ERR_PTR() if needed.

> +++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c
> @@ -698,6 +698,11 @@ int ieee80211_do_open(struct wireless_dev *wdev,
> bool coming_up)
>               rcu_assign_pointer(local->p2p_sdata, sdata);
>       }
>  
> +     if (local->open_count == 0 && local-
> >data_80211_hdr_offloaded) {
> +             local->hw.conf.encap_decap_80211_offloaded = true;
> +             hw_reconf_flags |=
> IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_OFFL;
> +     }

I don't see how this helps anything, I think you should remove it.

> +void ieee80211_if_config_80211_hdr_offl(struct ieee80211_local
> *local,
> +                                     bool enable_80211_hdr_offl)
> +{
> +     struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     int n_acs = IEEE80211_NUM_ACS;
> +     int ac;
> +
> +     ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +     if (!ieee80211_hw_check(&local->hw,
> SUPPORTS_80211_ENCAP_DECAP) ||
> +         !(ieee80211_hw_check(&local->hw, HAS_RATE_CONTROL)))
> +             return;
> +
> +     if (local->hw.wiphy->frag_threshold != (u32)-1 &&
> +         !local->ops->set_frag_threshold)
> +             return;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
> +             if (!sdata->dev)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             netif_tx_stop_all_queues(sdata->dev);
> +
> +             if (enable_80211_hdr_offl)
> +                     sdata->dev->netdev_ops =
> &ieee80211_dataif_8023_ops;
> +             else
> +                     sdata->dev->netdev_ops =
> &ieee80211_dataif_ops;
> +     }
> +
> +     mutex_unlock(&local->iflist_mtx);
> +
> +     local->data_80211_hdr_offloaded = enable_80211_hdr_offl;
> +
> +     if (local->started) {
> +             if (enable_80211_hdr_offl)
> +                     local->hw.conf.encap_decap_80211_offloaded =
> true;
> +             else
> +                     local->hw.conf.encap_decap_80211_offloaded =
> false;
> +             ieee80211_hw_config(local,
> +                                 IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_80211_HDR_
> OFFL);
> +     }
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
> +             if (!sdata->dev)
> +                     continue;
> +
> +             if (local->hw.queues < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS)
> +                     n_acs = 1;
> +
> +             spin_lock_irqsave(&local->queue_stop_reason_lock,
> flags);
> +             if (sdata->vif.cab_queue == IEEE80211_INVAL_HW_QUEUE
> ||
> +                 (local->queue_stop_reasons[sdata->vif.cab_queue] 
> == 0 &&
> +                  skb_queue_empty(&local->pending[sdata-
> >vif.cab_queue]))) {
> +                     for (ac = 0; ac < n_acs; ac++) {
> +                             int ac_queue = sdata-
> >vif.hw_queue[ac];
> +
> +                             if (local-
> >queue_stop_reasons[ac_queue] == 0 &&
> +                                 skb_queue_empty(&local-
> >pending[ac_queue]))
> +                                     netif_start_subqueue(sdata-
> >dev, ac);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local-
> >queue_stop_reason_lock, flags);
> +     }
> +
> +     mutex_unlock(&local->iflist_mtx);
> +}

I really would prefer we could simply avoid doing these manipulations
while the interface is UP and can have data queued.

> +++ b/net/mac80211/key.c
> @@ -208,13 +208,25 @@ static int ieee80211_key_enable_hw_accel(struct
> ieee80211_key *key)
>       case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_GCMP_256:
>               /* all of these we can do in software - if driver
> can */
>               if (ret == 1)
> -                     return 0;
> +                     goto check_8023_txrx;
>               if (ieee80211_hw_check(&key->local->hw,
> SW_CRYPTO_CONTROL))
>                       return -EINVAL;
> -             return 0;
> +             goto check_8023_txrx;
>       default:
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
> +
> +check_8023_txrx:
> +     /* When sw crypto is enabled make sure data tx/rx happens
> +      * in 802.11 format.
> +      */
> +     if (key->local->data_80211_hdr_offloaded) {
> +             rtnl_lock();
> +             ieee80211_if_config_80211_hdr_offl(key->local,
> false);
> +             rtnl_unlock();
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
>  }

Why not just refuse the key instead? It also seems wrong to do anything
with local-> here, it should be per interface.

> +++ b/net/mac80211/status.c
> @@ -506,12 +506,14 @@ static void ieee80211_report_used_skb(struct
> ieee80211_local *local,
>                                     struct sk_buff *skb, bool
> dropped)
>  {
>       struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> -     struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (void *)skb->data;
> +     struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
>       bool acked = info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK;
>  
>       if (dropped)
>               acked = false;
>  
> +     hdr = (void *)skb->data;

That change make no sense.

>       if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_INTFL_MLME_CONN_TX) {
>               struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
>  
> @@ -945,6 +947,85 @@ void ieee80211_tx_status(struct ieee80211_hw
> *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_tx_status);
>  
> +void ieee80211_tx_status_8023(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> +                           struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> +                           struct sk_buff *skb)

I think this could share some code with the 802.11 version?

> +     /* XXX: Add a generic helper for this */
> +     if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
> +         sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN ||
> +         sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)
> +             ether_addr_copy(ra_addr, ehdr->h_dest);

nit, but the "A" in "RA" already means address ... :)

You also don't need to copy it - just keeping a pointer should be fine?

> +     /* TODO: Handle frames requiring wifi tx status to be
> notified */
> +     if (skb->sk && skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags &
> SKBTX_WIFI_STATUS)
> +             goto out_free;

Surely you shouldn't free them, even if you don't handle the status?!

johannes

Reply via email to