Hi, On 27 February 2017 at 18:10, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/27/2017 07:26 AM, Andrew Zaborowski wrote: >> As it turns out it can be read from /sys, but I do need it so I can >> know what to put in HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_RECEIVER based on the destination >> addr in the frame or if I want to forward the frame to all radios. Or >> is there another way to know that? >> >>> >>> I'd actually prefer to *only* have the wiphy index, and I don't really >>> see a problem with moving the wiphy_idx from struct >>> cfg80211_registered_device to struct wiphy. >> >> >> Ok, I'll try that. get_wiphy_idx can stay in place, not sure if I >> should just drop it. >> >> By having *only* the wiphy index you don't mean dropping the radio >> names altogether? The don't seem useful but userspace may expect >> them. > > > I find the name and addr more useful than an 'index', because if you > remove/add > a virtual phy, then the index will probably change, even if name and MAC
I don't think you can remove/add a phy without removing the hwsim radio. A hwsim radio is tied to some wiphy at all times. > addr may stay > the same (and so probably be the same logical entitity). They may stay the same or not, you can't assume either. Sorry I don't understand your point. Best regards
