On 8-3-2017 11:08, Hans de Goede wrote:
> HI,
> 
> On 08-03-17 10:57, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 8-3-2017 9:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 07-03-17 10:59, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>>> On 27-2-2017 22:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>>> Using pr_err for things which are not errors is a bad idea. E.g. it
>>>>>> will cause the plymouth bootsplash screen to drop back to the text
>>>>>> console so that the user can see the error, which is not what we
>>>>>> normally want to happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instead add a new brcmf_info macro and use that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>> -Fix brcm_err typo (should be brcmf_err) in CONFIG_BRCM_TRACING case
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h  | 3 +++
>>>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git
>>>>>> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>>>>> index 3e15d64..6d565f1 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/common.c
>>>>>> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds(struct brcmf_if *ifp)
>>>>>>      strsep(&ptr, "\n");
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      /* Print fw version info */
>>>>>> -    brcmf_err("Firmware version = %s\n", buf);
>>>>>> +    brcmf_info("Firmware version = %s\n", buf);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      /* locate firmware version number for ethtool */
>>>>>>      ptr = strrchr(buf, ' ') + 1;
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h
>>>>>> index 6687812..605f260 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h
>>>>>> @@ -59,11 +59,14 @@
>>>>>>              pr_err("%s: " fmt, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__);    \
>>>>>>      } while (0)
>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>> +#define brcmf_info(fmt, ...)    pr_info("%s: " fmt, __func__,
>>>>>> ##__VA_ARGS__)
>>>>>
>>>>> Prefer using the same style as for brcmf_err, ie. using do {} while
>>>>> (0)
>>>>
>>>> OK, v3 with this fixed coming up.
>>>
>>> I think Kalle prefers the whole series to be resubmitted.
>>>
>>> Kalle,
>>>
>>> Can you confirm (or deny)?
>>
>> Exactly, I want to apply the full series (with the highest version
>> number). Not waste time guessing what patches I should take and what to
>> drop, with the increased risk of guessing wrong.
> 
> Ok, so patch 2/4 is still under discussion (and may be so for a while)
> shall I send a new version with that patch dropped ?  And then send
> that patch (or a modified version) separately later ?

Yeah. Let's drop that patch for now.

Regards,
Arend

Reply via email to