Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromd...@gmail.com> writes:
> sdio/mailbox HIF implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromd...@gmail.com>
I'm looking at this more carefully now and noticed this:
> +static int ath10k_sdio_bmi_credits(struct ath10k *ar)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 addr, *cmd_credits;
> + unsigned long timeout;
> +
> + cmd_credits = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmd_credits), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cmd_credits) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Read the counter register to get the command credits */
> + addr = MBOX_COUNT_DEC_ADDRESS + ATH10K_HIF_MBOX_NUM_MAX * 4;
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + BMI_COMMUNICATION_TIMEOUT_HZ;
> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout) && !*cmd_credits) {
> + /* Hit the credit counter with a 4-byte access, the first byte
> + * read will hit the counter and cause a decrement, while the
> + * remaining 3 bytes has no effect. The rationale behind this
> + * is to make all HIF accesses 4-byte aligned.
> + */
> + ret = ath10k_sdio_read_write_sync(ar, addr,
> + (u8 *)cmd_credits,
> + sizeof(*cmd_credits),
> + HIF_RD_SYNC_BYTE_INC);
> + if (ret) {
> + ath10k_warn(ar,
> + "Unable to decrement the command credit
> count register: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> +
> + /* The counter is only 8 bits.
> + * Ignore anything in the upper 3 bytes
> + */
> + *cmd_credits &= 0xFF;
> + }
> +
> + if (!*cmd_credits) {
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "bmi communication timeout\n");
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto err_free;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +err_free:
> + kfree(cmd_credits);
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
AFAICS we are leaking cmd_credits if there's no error. Or is the buffer
freed somewhere within the mmc stack or something? The reason why I ask
is that I saw the same pattern in multiple functions so I'm curious.
--
Kalle Valo
