On 17-3-2017 10:24, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 10:06 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 16-3-2017 22:51, Mark Asselstine wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:51:52 PM EDT Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>> To support network namespace the driver must assure all created
>>>> network interfaces are in the same namespace as the wiphy
>>>> instance.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselst...@windriver.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>> Please check this patch. I can not say I am an expert when it
>>>> comes
>>>> to using namespaces. So let me know if it works and I can change
>>>> Reported-by into Tested-by.
>>>
>>> Seems to pass the tests I threw at it. Seems happy with namespaces.
>>
>> I tested it myself and noticed something unexpected. Upon changing
>> from &init_net to brcm-wifi the wdev id has changed from 0x1 to 0x2
>> (see below) and upon going from brcm-wifi to &init_net both interface
>> change their wdev id.
> 
> Interesting. That's clearly a cfg80211 bug, does this help?
> 
> diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
> index 2e1740c7a8bf..d71d5e90229f 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/core.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/core.c
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,15 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call(struct 
> notifier_block *nb,
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wdev->mgmt_registrations);
>               spin_lock_init(&wdev->mgmt_registrations_lock);
>  
> -             wdev->identifier = ++rdev->wdev_id;
> +             /*
> +              * We get here also when the interface changes network 
> namespaces,
> +              * as it's registered into the new one, but we don't want it to
> +              * change ID in that case. Checking if the ID is already 
> assigned
> +              * works, because 0 isn't considered a valid ID and the memory 
> is
> +              * 0-initialized.
> +              */
> +             if (!wdev->identifier)
> +                     wdev->identifier = ++rdev->wdev_id;

Given my debug session just a minute ago I would say yes ;-) as this is
where I put wiphy_err() statement. Will give it a quick spin.

Regards,
Arend

>               list_add_rcu(&wdev->list, &rdev->wiphy.wdev_list);
>               rdev->devlist_generation++;
>               /* can only change netns with wiphy */
> 
> johannes
> 

Reply via email to