Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote:
> My static checker complains that we have an upper bound but no lower
> bound. I suspect neither are really required but it doesn't hurt to add
> a check for negatives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> index c53cbf3d52bd..294a6b43d1bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static void _rtl_add_wowlan_patterns(struct ieee80211_hw
> *hw,
> for (i = 0; i < wow->n_patterns; i++) {
> memset(&rtl_pattern, 0, sizeof(struct rtl_wow_pattern));
> memset(mask, 0, MAX_WOL_BIT_MASK_SIZE);
> - if (patterns[i].pattern_len > MAX_WOL_PATTERN_SIZE) {
> + if (patterns[i].pattern_len < 0 ||
> + patterns[i].pattern_len > MAX_WOL_PATTERN_SIZE) {
> RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_POWER, DBG_WARNING,
> "Pattern[%d] is too long\n", i);
> continue;
Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.
64e79426c204 rtlwifi: silence underflow warning
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9977201/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
