> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arend van Spriel [mailto:arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 4:13 PM
> To: Pkshih; kv...@codeaurora.org
> Cc: larry.fin...@lwfinger.net; 莊彥宣; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] rtlwifi: fix scan channel 1 fail after IPS
> 
> On 1/10/2018 6:19 AM, pks...@realtek.com wrote:
> > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pks...@realtek.com>
> >
> > If there is no connection, driver will enter IPS state. Meanwhile, it
> > fails to scan channel 1 by the command 'iw dev wlan0 scan freq 2412',
> > because hardware channel setting lose after IPS. Thus, restore channel
> > setting from hw->conf.channel set by last rtl_op_config().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Lee <tim...@realtek.com>
> 
> You need to add your sob here as well as you are submitting them.
> 

I'll add it in v2.

> > ---
> >   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c | 6 ++++++
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c 
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
> > index 6a4008845f49..0ffe43772c9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/ps.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ bool rtl_ps_enable_nic(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
> >                     &rtlmac->retry_long);
> >     RT_CLEAR_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC);
> >
> > +   /*<2.1> Switch Channel & Bandwidth to last rtl_op_config setting*/
> 
> Is this type of comment really helpful? To me it seems the callback
> names provide enough context.
> 

Do you mean the "<2.1>" isn't needed? 
This is because "<1>, <2>, <3>..." exist in the function, so
we want to make it to be consistent.

PK

Reply via email to