On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 11:09 -0600, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> 
> +     WIPHY_FLAG_CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211    = BIT(25),

I think it'd be easier for everyone to just use an nl80211 extended
feature flag for this, then you also don't need this code:

> +     if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211]) {
> +             if (!info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_SOCKET_OWNER])
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +
> +             if (!(rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_CONTROL_PORT_OVER_NL80211))
> +                     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +             settings->control_port_over_nl80211 = true;
> +     } else {
> +             settings->control_port_over_nl80211 = false;
> +     }

Nit: you don't really need the else branch.

johannes

Reply via email to