On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 13:19 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 01:09 AM, pks...@realtek.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pks...@realtek.com>
> >
> > After mac power-on sequence, wifi will start to work so notify
> > btcoex the
> > event to configure registers especially related to antenna. This
> > will not
> > only help to assign antenna but also to yield better user
> > experience.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pks...@realtek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.h | 1
> > +
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.c | 6
> > ++++++
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.h | 1
> > +
> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h | 1
> > +
> > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.h
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.h
> > index ea12b9d63a73..bc523af7ef88 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.h
> > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ extern struct btc_coexist gl_bt_coexist;
> >
> > bool exhalbtc_initlize_variables(void);
> > bool exhalbtc_bind_bt_coex_withadapter(void *adapter);
> > +void exhalbtc_power_on_setting(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist);
> > void exhalbtc_init_hw_config(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist, bool
> > wifi_only);
> > void exhalbtc_init_coex_dm(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist);
> > void exhalbtc_ips_notify(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist, u8 type);
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.c
> > index 4d9e33078d4f..9e3623b0423c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > static struct rtl_btc_ops rtl_btc_operation = {
> > .btc_init_variables = rtl_btc_init_variables,
> > .btc_init_hal_vars = rtl_btc_init_hal_vars,
> > + .btc_power_on_setting = rtl_btc_power_on_setting,
> > .btc_init_hw_config = rtl_btc_init_hw_config,
> > .btc_ips_notify = rtl_btc_ips_notify,
> > .btc_lps_notify = rtl_btc_lps_notify,
> > @@ -116,6 +117,11 @@ void rtl_btc_init_hal_vars(struct rtl_priv
> > *rtlpriv)
> > */
> > }
> >
> > +void rtl_btc_power_on_setting(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv)
> > +{
> > + exhalbtc_power_on_setting(&gl_bt_coexist);
> > +}
> > +
> > void rtl_btc_init_hw_config(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv)
> > {
> > u8 bt_exist;
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.h
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.h
> > index 40f1ce8c8a06..9becfa59407d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/rtl_btc.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >
> > void rtl_btc_init_variables(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void rtl_btc_init_hal_vars(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > +void rtl_btc_power_on_setting(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void rtl_btc_init_hw_config(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void rtl_btc_ips_notify(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv, u8 type);
> > void rtl_btc_lps_notify(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv, u8 type);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h
> > index 941694060f48..b27dbe10b163 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h
> > @@ -2557,6 +2557,7 @@ struct bt_coexist_info {
> > struct rtl_btc_ops {
> > void (*btc_init_variables) (struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void (*btc_init_hal_vars) (struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > + void (*btc_power_on_setting)(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void (*btc_init_hw_config) (struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv);
> > void (*btc_ips_notify) (struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv, u8
> > type);
> > void (*btc_lps_notify)(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv, u8
> > type);
> >
> I do not see any place in the code where rtl_btc_power_on_setting()
> is called,
> either directly or by callback. Did I miss it?
>
This will be called by 8822be and 8723de during initializing hardware,
and originally 8723be will also need it (little ant_sel related) but
you had fixed it by the commits 6d6226928369 and a33fcba6ec01. I'll
check whether 8723be has to call this or not.
PK
