Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes: > On 5/23/2018 9:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Ganapathi Bhat <gb...@marvell.com> writes: >> >>> In V2: >>> >>> return ret; >>> } >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mwifiex_send_cmd); >>> >>> Instead of exporting 'mwifiex_send_cmd' we can prepare a wrapper for >>> the command 'MWIFIEX_IFACE_WORK_DEVICE_DUMP' in mwifiex module. Let me >>> know if we can send a follow up. >> >> So what's the plan? Can I apply this patch or should I drop it? > > Sorry. Had to reply that earlier. When adding the export I figured it > might not be desirable. If Ganapathi can fix it with a follow up patch > that would ok, right?
A follow up patch sounds good to me. > Than you can apply it, I would say. Good, thanks. -- Kalle Valo