Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> writes:

> On 5/23/2018 9:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Ganapathi Bhat <gb...@marvell.com> writes:
>>
>>> In V2:
>>>
>>>          return ret;
>>>   }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mwifiex_send_cmd);
>>>
>>> Instead of exporting 'mwifiex_send_cmd' we can prepare a wrapper for
>>> the command 'MWIFIEX_IFACE_WORK_DEVICE_DUMP' in mwifiex module. Let me
>>> know if we can send a follow up.
>>
>> So what's the plan? Can I apply this patch or should I drop it?
>
> Sorry. Had to reply that earlier. When adding the export I figured it
> might not be desirable. If Ganapathi can fix it with a follow up patch
> that would ok, right?

A follow up patch sounds good to me.

> Than you can apply it, I would say.

Good, thanks.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Reply via email to