This flag is unneccesary. We can just nullify `ddev' instead after we freed it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <dan...@zonque.org> --- drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c index a50a95cfcfd8..ef91ca8b53a4 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c @@ -220,7 +220,6 @@ struct st95_digital_cmd_complete_arg { * from threaded ISR. Usage of this mutex avoids any race between * deletion of the object from st95hf_remove() and its access from * the threaded ISR. - * @nfcdev_free: flag to have the state of nfc device object. * [alive | died] * @current_protocol: current nfc protocol. * @current_rf_tech: current rf technology. @@ -237,7 +236,6 @@ struct st95hf_context { unsigned char sendrcv_trflag; struct semaphore exchange_lock; struct mutex rm_lock; - bool nfcdev_free; u8 current_protocol; u8 current_rf_tech; int fwi; @@ -822,8 +820,8 @@ static irqreturn_t st95hf_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *st95hfcontext) goto end; } - /* if stcontext->nfcdev_free is true, it means remove already ran */ - if (stcontext->nfcdev_free) { + /* if stcontext->ddev is %NULL, it means remove already ran */ + if (!stcontext->ddev) { result = -ENODEV; goto end; } @@ -1222,7 +1220,7 @@ static int st95hf_remove(struct spi_device *nfc_spi_dev) nfc_digital_unregister_device(stcontext->ddev); nfc_digital_free_device(stcontext->ddev); - stcontext->nfcdev_free = true; + stcontext->ddev = NULL; mutex_unlock(&stcontext->rm_lock); -- 2.17.1