Hi On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:27:22PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:56:08PM +0200, Gruszka wrote: > > Register 66 was causing issues on RT6352 if set to the same value as > > in MTK driver. With 1c reg value device was working fine in both HT20 > > and HT40 modes. > > My guess is that this may change once we add proper TSSI which involes > parts of AGC init as well. I suggest to add a comment in the code to > reflect that.
I don't understand what you suggest, could you be more specific ? > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > index 1a2bf6c49b82..3a04eaef8511 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c > > @@ -3981,11 +3981,7 @@ static void rt2800_config_channel(struct rt2x00_dev > > *rt2x00dev, > > rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 196, reg); > > > > /* AGC init */ > > - if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352)) > > - reg = 0x04; > > - else > > - reg = rf->channel <= 14 ? 0x1c : 0x24; > > - > > + reg = rf->channel <= 14 ? 0x1c : 0x24; > > reg += 2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain; > > We can summerize the two lines into > reg = 0x1c + (2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain); > which is also what is was before introducing support for MT7620. I think you mean reg = (rf->channel <= 14 ? 0x1c : 0x24) + 2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain; to do not break 5GHz support for RT5592. I can change that in separate patch, since this one in not technically wrong. Thanks Stanislaw
