On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 13:05 +0300, Lior David wrote: > > On 10/11/2018 1:05 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. The send to same socket does sound more > > > efficient. > > > (In our internal implementation with vendor commands we were forced > > > to send the results as broadcast...) > > > > I suppose we can fix that, in the sense that we can add API to allow > > vendor commands to know the socket to send back to etc. > > > > I think that would be useful in general though as far as I know we don't have > any pending feature that requires it right now.
Ok. For the record, I have no objection to somebody who needs this doing it, but it's not entirely trivial so I'm not going to just do it now. johannes
