Luciano Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com> writes:
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_INTEL)
>> + if (firmware_unlock_func) {
>> + firmware_unlock_func();
>> + symbol_put(btintel_firmware_lock);
>> + firmware_lock_func = NULL;
>> + symbol_put(btintel_firmware_unlock);
>> + firmware_unlock_func = NULL;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> + }
>> else
>> ret = iwl_pcie_load_given_ucode(trans, fw);
>>
>
> I'm not sure I like adding this BT-specific stuff here, especially not
> without a detailed explanation.
This looks like an ugly hack and the commit log tells nothing. This
really needs strong justifications to even consider doing something like
this.
--
Kalle Valo
