On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:06:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Lance Roy <[email protected]> writes: > > > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements, > > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is > > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <[email protected]> > > Cc: Daniel Drake <[email protected]> > > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <[email protected]> > > Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Should I take this or is it going through some other tree? Sure you can take this if you like. If not, Paul McKenney will take it in his tree.
Thanks, Lance > If it goes to via some other tree: > > Acked-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> > > -- > Kalle Valo
