> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kalle Valo [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:00 PM
> To: Tony Chuang
> Cc: Larry Finger; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines
>
> Tony Chuang <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Larry Finger [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry
> Finger
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 11:17 PM
> >> To: Tony Chuang; [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting
> routines
> >>
> >> On 5/29/19 2:54 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> >> > From: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> > Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
> >> > their declaration in header file phy.h.
> >> >
> >> > After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
> >> > So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them
> static.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> This patch does not apply. Using quilt to see what is wrong, there are 6
> >> changes
> >> that have already been applied.
> >>
> >> Larry
> >>
> >
> >
> > These patches are based on
> >
> >
> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-dr
> ivers
> > branch master
> >
> > commit 6aca09771db4277a78853d6ac680d8d5f0d915e3
> > Author: YueHaibing <[email protected]>
> > Date: Sat May 4 18:32:24 2019 +0800
> >
> > rtw88: Make some symbols static
> >
> >
> > It should apply, did I miss something?
>
> I keep the bar high and take to wireless-drivers only patches which fix
> important, user visible problems. Everything else goes to
> wireless-drivers-next. So you should use wireless-drivers-next as the
> baseline for all regular patches.
Hi, Kalle
But this series has dependency with " rtw88: Make some symbols static"
Or you can handle it
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
>
Yan-Hsuan
