On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 18:47 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > +static int ath11k_mac_op_config(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 changed) > +{ > + struct ath11k *ar = hw->priv; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* mac80211 requires this op to be present and that's why > + * there's an empty function, this can be extended when > + * required. > + */
Well, oops. Maybe it shouldn't be required? > + mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex); > + > + /* TODO: Handle configuration changes as appropriate */ > + > + mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex); It's not actually empty though - why bother locking the mutex for nothing? > + if (sta->mfp) { > + /* TODO: Need to check if FW supports PMF? */ Probably not? shouldn't get a sta with MFP unless you advertised support for it. At least I'd think so, and consider it a mac80211 bug if you still did. > + /* This is a workaround for HT-enabled STAs which break the spec > + * and have no HT capabilities RX mask (no HT RX MCS map). > + * > + * As per spec, in section 20.3.5 Modulation and coding scheme (MCS), > + * MCS 0 through 7 are mandatory in 20MHz with 800 ns GI at all STAs. Wouldn't that better be in mac80211? > + ampdu_factor = (vht_cap->cap & > + IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_MAX_A_MPDU_LENGTH_EXPONENT_MASK) >> > + IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_MAX_A_MPDU_LENGTH_EXPONENT_SHIFT; consider u32_get_bits() or something like that from bitfield.h > + /* Workaround: Some Netgear/Linksys 11ac APs set Rx A-MPDU factor to > + * zero in VHT IE. Using it would result in degraded throughput. > + * arg->peer_max_mpdu at this point contains HT max_mpdu so keep > + * it if VHT max_mpdu is smaller. > + */ > + arg->peer_max_mpdu = max(arg->peer_max_mpdu, > + (1U << (IEEE80211_HT_MAX_AMPDU_FACTOR + > + ampdu_factor)) - 1); Wait, that seems familiar. Again, put it into mac80211? > +static void ath11k_peer_assoc_h_smps(struct ieee80211_sta *sta, > + struct peer_assoc_params *arg) > +{ > + const struct ieee80211_sta_ht_cap *ht_cap = &sta->ht_cap; > + int smps; > + > + if (!ht_cap->ht_supported) > + return; > + > + smps = ht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SM_PS; > + smps >>= IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SM_PS_SHIFT; also here, u*_get_bits() or something might be nicer (and yes, I've written tons of code like this myself before that existed, which is why I'm pointing it out - it's much nicer) > +void ath11k_mac_drain_tx(struct ath11k *ar) > +{ > + /* make sure rcu-protected mac80211 tx path itself is drained */ > + synchronize_net(); Doesn't mac80211 ensure that in the relevant places like flush()? But then again, not sure where you call this. > + ath11k_dbg(ar->ab, ATH11K_DBG_MAC, "mac set fixed rate params vdev %i > rate 0x%02hhx nss %hhu sgi %hhu\n", > + arvif->vdev_id, rate, nss, sgi); nit: that could use a line-break > + vdev_param = WMI_VDEV_PARAM_FIXED_RATE; > + ret = ath11k_wmi_vdev_set_param_cmd(ar, arvif->vdev_id, > + vdev_param, rate); > + if (ret) { > + ath11k_warn(ar->ab, "failed to set fixed rate param 0x%02x: > %d\n", > > + /* TODO: Check if HT capability advertised from firmware is different > + * for each band for a dual band capable radio. It will be tricky to > + * handle it when the ht capability different for each band. > + */ For each band shouldn't really be that tricky? johannes