Hi,

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:40 AM Miquel Raynal
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> [email protected] wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:37:23 -0400:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:51 AM Miquel Raynal
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Coordinators may have to handle association requests from peers which
> > > want to join the PAN. The logic involves:
> > > - Acknowledging the request (done by hardware)
> > > - If requested, a random short address that is free on this PAN should
> > >   be chosen for the device.
> > > - Sending an association response with the short address allocated for
> > >   the peer and expecting it to be ack'ed.
> > >
> > > If anything fails during this procedure, the peer is considered not
> > > associated.
> >
> > I thought a coordinator can also reject requests for _any_ reason and
> > it's very user specific whatever that reason is.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> > If we have such a case (that it is very user specific what to do
> > exactly) this should be able to be controlled by the user space to
> > have there a logic to tell the kernel to accept or reject the
> > association.
>
> Agreed (not implemented yet, though).
>
> > However, I am fine with this solution, but I think we might want to
> > change this behaviour in the future so that an application in the user
> > space has the logic to tell the kernel to accept or reject an
> > association. That would make sense?
>
> Definitely, yes.

ok, thanks to have some agreement here for the future.

- Alex

Reply via email to