Hi Stefan, [email protected] wrote on Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:47:03 +0100:
> Allow running: > iwpan phy <phy> scan trigger ... > iwpan phy <phy> scan abort ... > > Aside with the existing: > iwpan dev <dev> scan trigger ... > iwpan dev <dev> scan abort ... > > This change does not apply easily to the TOPLEVEL(scan) command, so we > keep this one more constrained for simplicity. I believe this patch felt into the cracks, I think I remember it came from a request from Alex, maybe you will want to consider it for merge despite its "age"? Or maybe I missed some feedback in the SPAMS /o\ > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]> > --- > src/scan.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/scan.c b/src/scan.c > index e92702d..8bc21ca 100644 > --- a/src/scan.c > +++ b/src/scan.c > @@ -541,11 +541,15 @@ TOPLEVEL(scan, "type <type> [page <page>] [channels > <bitfield>] [duration <durat > SCAN_TYPES); > COMMAND(scan, abort, NULL, NL802154_CMD_ABORT_SCAN, 0, CIB_NETDEV, > scan_abort_handler, > "Abort ongoing scanning on this virtual interface"); > +COMMAND(scan, abort, NULL, NL802154_CMD_ABORT_SCAN, 0, CIB_PHY, > scan_abort_handler, NULL); > COMMAND(scan, trigger, > "type <type> [page <page>] [channels <bitfield>] [duration > <duration-order>]", > NL802154_CMD_TRIGGER_SCAN, 0, CIB_NETDEV, scan_trigger_handler, > "Launch scanning on this virtual interface with the given > configuration.\n" > SCAN_TYPES); > +COMMAND(scan, trigger, > + "type <type> [page <page>] [channels <bitfield>] [duration > <duration-order>]", > + NL802154_CMD_TRIGGER_SCAN, 0, CIB_PHY, scan_trigger_handler, NULL); > > SECTION(beacons); > Thanks, Miquèl
