On 30/08/2024 18:02, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 04:14:02PM +0800, Shen Lichuan wrote:
>> Use dev_err_probe() to simplify the error path and unify a message
>> template.
>>
>> Using this helper is totally fine even if err is known to never
>> be -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> The benefit compared to a normal dev_err() is the standardized format
>> of the error code, it being emitted symbolically and the fact that
>> the error code is returned which allows more compact error paths.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <[email protected]>
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -1576,9 +1574,8 @@ static int at86rf230_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>  
>>      lp->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &at86rf230_regmap_spi_config);
>>      if (IS_ERR(lp->regmap)) {
>> -            rc = PTR_ERR(lp->regmap);
>> -            dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
>> -                    rc);
>> +            dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, PTR_ERR(lp->regmap),
>> +                          "Failed to allocate register map\n");
>>              goto free_dev;
> 
> After branching to dev_free the function will return rc.
> So I think it still needs to be set a in this error path.

Another bug introduced by @vivo.com.

Since ~2 weeks there is tremendous amount of trivial patches coming from
vivo.com. I identified at least 5 buggy, where the contributor did not
understand the code.

All these "trivial" improvements should be really double-checked.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Reply via email to