On 03. 02. 20 7:09, qwang2 wrote: > Hi Amit, > > On 2020/2/3 下午1:51, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> The patch looks fine to me. >> >> >> >> But I have few queries, @Michal Simek <mailto:mich...@xilinx.com> >> kindly share your thoughts. >> >> I had sent spi-nor framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver rebse_v5.4 >> patches to https://gitenterprise.xilinx.com/Linux/linux-xlnx and >> @qwang2 <mailto:quanyang.w...@windriver.com> has sent spi-nor >> framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver rebse_v5.4 patches to >> >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-dev/tree/?h=standard/xlnx-soc >> >> >> Implementation wise there is a diff between both these trees w.r.t >> spi-nor framework and zynq/zynqmp qspi driver files. >> >> >> >> Are these trees independent of each other, hence we can have diff >> between both these trees ? >> > Yes, they are independent. The rebase_v5.4 patches in > https://gitenterprise.xilinx.com/Linux/linux-xlnx will be applied to the > later linux-yocto kernel versions (v5.5, v5.6, etc).
At some point there should be some synchronization done. M
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8363): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8363 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/69464832/21656 Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
