On 3/11/20 11:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:40 AM <zhe...@windriver.com> wrote:
>> From: He Zhe <zhe...@windriver.com>
>>
>> This series of commits do not work with the latest systemd-udevd(v244, likely
>> v245). And the mainline has confirmed this potential misbehaviour.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200304133738.gf21...@quack2.suse.cz/
>>
>> As it would run out of memory very soon and make the system unavailable, it
>> seems we'd better apply the reverts first.
> Since these came out, I've upgraded -dev to v5.6,  I can apply these
> to v5.5/*. Have you confirmed if 5.6 has the same issue ?

I just confirmed that it also happens with the latest 5.6-rc5.

Zhe

>
> Bruce
>
>> With this series of reverts applied, I just did some random file and disk
>> operations and did not meet errors.
>>
>> He Zhe (5):
>>   Revert "block: move clearing bd_invalidated into
>>     check_disk_size_change"
>>   Revert "block: remove (__)blkdev_reread_part as an exported API"
>>   Revert "block: fix bdev_disk_changed for non-partitioned devices"
>>   Revert "block: move rescan_partitions to fs/block_dev.c"
>>   Revert "block: merge invalidate_partitions into rescan_partitions"
>>
>>  block/ioctl.c                   | 37 +++++++++++++++++++----
>>  block/partition-generic.c       | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  drivers/block/loop.c            | 13 ++++-----
>>  drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c |  4 +--
>>  fs/block_dev.c                  | 50 ++++++++-----------------------
>>  include/linux/fs.h              |  4 +++
>>  include/linux/genhd.h           |  5 ++--
>>  7 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.24.1
>>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8463): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/8463
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/71728956/21656
Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to